lora_radio_coverage
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| lora_radio_coverage [2016/10/15 21:47] – [3. Experiment Settings and Data Analysis] samer | lora_radio_coverage [2016/10/15 21:48] – [5. Lessons and Future Works] samer | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
| ===== -. Lessons and Future Works ===== | ===== -. Lessons and Future Works ===== | ||
| This basic coverage test shows the exciting performance of the LoRa technology: | This basic coverage test shows the exciting performance of the LoRa technology: | ||
| - | * We successfully covered large parts of the campus with a very small transmission device placed indoors. Can you imagine the same with WiFi? | + | * We successfully covered large parts of the campus with a very small transmission device placed indoors. Can you imagine the same with WiFi/ |
| * The mobile device is powered by a smartphone. We can expect small LoRa end-devices to work on a battery for years. Can you imagine the same with GPRS, 3G, or 4G technologies? | * The mobile device is powered by a smartphone. We can expect small LoRa end-devices to work on a battery for years. Can you imagine the same with GPRS, 3G, or 4G technologies? | ||
| * The test is performed with a spreading factor of 7, we would expect more robust communication (thus, larger coverage) with higher spreading factors. | * The test is performed with a spreading factor of 7, we would expect more robust communication (thus, larger coverage) with higher spreading factors. | ||
lora_radio_coverage.txt · Last modified: 2021/08/28 09:49 by samer