qos_project
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
qos_project [2017/12/15 11:40] – [8. [PO3] Analyzing QoS] carine | qos_project [2017/12/18 15:03] – [8. [PO3] Analyzing QoS] carine | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 294: | Line 294: | ||
===== -. [PO3] Analyzing QoS ===== | ===== -. [PO3] Analyzing QoS ===== | ||
- | In this section, we have to consider different congestion scenarios: The link between the two routers will have a bandwidth of 16 Mb/s, 8 Mb/s and 5 Mb/s. | + | In this section, we have to consider different congestion scenarios: The link between the two routers will have a bandwidth of 16 Mb/s, 8 Mb/s and 5 Mb/s.For each case, we will be considering both the implementation and the absence of QoS. |
__**1. 16Mb/s**__ | __**1. 16Mb/s**__ | ||
+ | - __Without QoS:__ | ||
+ | - __With QoS:__ | ||
First, we have to create a common class 1:1 for all types of traffic, as before. | First, we have to create a common class 1:1 for all types of traffic, as before. | ||
Then, the following commands are executed in order to create two classes: 1:20 for video udp traffic with a bandwidth of ((87*16000)/ | Then, the following commands are executed in order to create two classes: 1:20 for video udp traffic with a bandwidth of ((87*16000)/ | ||
Line 309: | Line 311: | ||
* VLC video udp | * VLC video udp | ||
* iperf udp traffic on destination port 5201 | * iperf udp traffic on destination port 5201 | ||
+ | **On the client side:** | ||
+ | <code bash> iperf3 -c 192.168.100.111 -u -b 50M -P 3 -t 80 -p 5201 </ | ||
* iperf tcp traffic on destination port 5202, using the following commands: | * iperf tcp traffic on destination port 5202, using the following commands: | ||
qos_project.txt · Last modified: 2021/08/28 09:58 by samer